Coming from a
coaching background, 10 years ago in my teacher training I was repeatedly told that ‘teaching isn’t coaching’… and they were right – it did feel
different but I couldn’t quite figure out why. Maybe it had something to do
with the instruction to follow a set curriculum regardless of student learning:
lesson 1: dribbling; lesson 2: passing; etc… (yes, I was actually told this and was surrounded by this as standard practice in that setting...).
But my lines
between teaching and coaching have got a bit blurry lately. I’m unsure whether my teaching background is
informing my coaching or my coaching informing my teaching. Or, more likely, both informing each other.
I have QTS and a
PGCE in FE, but I’m finding now my default approach to classroom teaching is to
consider “how would I approach this as a coach…” which seems especially appropriate
when I’m working with Sport Coaching students.
Teaching,
coaching, whatever you want to label it, I’m of the opinion its basically about
coaching people – not teaching a subject, or coaching a sport, but people. And that’s a pretty good place to start: who
are you coaching, what’s their ‘why’ and how can you connect with it? And from there, what are you coaching and how
are you coaching it – and each answer informing and being informed by the
other.
In other words…
constructively aligning your coaching:
A Framework for
Coach Decision Making (Abraham, Muir & Morgan, 2010)
If we’re teaching
people to be sports coaches, then to me the most important part in my delivery
is to ensure I’m modelling what I would hope to see on the coaching pitch:
someone who is motivated to be there, enthusiastic and cares about the players.
If you can get those things right, then surely it’s a pretty good place to start:
So let's not bother with the pedantics of whether it's teaching or coaching, and focus on what's really important - the players.
So let's not bother with the pedantics of whether it's teaching or coaching, and focus on what's really important - the players.